POSI - Panorama Scholarly Index
MQSArticle-level · 0–25 points (MQF subfactor)

Metadata Quality Score

MQS measures the completeness of article-level metadata across nine criteria, scored out of 25. It is one of six components that make up the POSI Quality Framework (PQF), weighted at 25% — inside the PQF formula this same figure is labeled the Metadata Quality Factor (MQF); MQS is its standalone name when published on this page. MQS is based entirely on publicly verifiable metadata fields.

What MQS Measures

MQS evaluates whether a journal's articles have the metadata fields required for scholarly discoverability, citation tracking, author disambiguation, and open text mining. All criteria are checked against Crossref metadata records and public article pages. No proprietary databases are used.

MQS is a journal-level aggregate: each criterion is evaluated across a sample of recent articles and scored proportionally. A journal scores full points for a criterion when all sampled articles satisfy it.

25

Maximum MQS Points

MQF subfactor weight in PQF

79

Platform Average MQS

Across 31 verified journal records

9

Scored Criteria

All based on Crossref + public article pages

Scoring Criteria

#CriterionRationalePts
1DOI registered with Crossref for all articlesMinimum requirement for POSI article metadata4
2Crossref metadata complete (title, author, publication date)Required for discoverability in all major indexes4
3Author names structured (given name + family name)Required for citation disambiguation3
4ORCID supplied for at least one author per articleOpen researcher identifier, enables author disambiguation3
5Abstract and keywords present in metadata recordRequired for search engine indexing and topic classification3
6Reference list deposited with Crossref and parseableEnables open citation tracking via I4OC participation3
7License URI present in Crossref metadata recordMachine-readable license required for text mining reuse2
8PDF or HTML full-text link stable and accessibleRequired for content-level discoverability2
9Article type clearly identified (research/review/editorial)Enables article type filtering in indexes1
Total (MQF subfactor)25

MQS Score Bands

85–100ExcellentNear-complete metadata; eligible for major scholarly indexes
70–84GoodStrong metadata coverage with minor gaps
55–69SatisfactoryCore fields present; ORCID and references often missing
40–54DevelopingDOI registered but metadata completeness needs improvement
< 40InsufficientCritical metadata fields missing; not indexing-ready